Close

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,488
    Rep Points
    32,174.7
    Mentioned
    2112 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322


    Yes Reputation No

    EVO standing kilometer drag race between the 2014 Nissan GTR and Porsche 991 Turbo Cabriolet with launch control

    An interesting drag race here between two cars we all know very well. The Nissan GTR and Porsche 911 Turbo are constantly compared to one another. Nissan fired the first volleys when they made sure the world knew they were testing the GTR's performance against the 911 Turbo. The GTR during development was constantly spotted with a 997.1 Turbo trailing the test team. Since both have twin turbo six cylinders, dual clutch transmissions, and all wheel drive, these comparisons are only natural.

    Click here to enlarge

    The 2014 GTR is no slouch performance wise especially in a straight line. It is capable of 11.0 second flat 1/4 mile runs with trap speeds in the 124-125 mile per hour range. The 911 Turbo is a bit of a conundrum as performance testing has shown inconsistent figures. EVO chose the 991 Turbo cabriolet for whatever reason which is the heaviest and slowest 911 Turbo model.

    The 991 Turbo has 520 horsepower from its 3.8 liter direct injected flat-6 motor which is 25 less than the 2014 GTR. At roughly 3600 pounds the 911 Turbo is about 250 pounds lighter than the GTR but heavier than the coupe. Speaking of the 991 Turbo coupe, independent testing on the 1/4 mile drag strip showed a 10.9 @ 126 1/4 mile pass.

    On paper, this drag race should be close. As the video shows however, it isn't that close. The 991 Turbo Cabriolet spanks the GTR. How do we explain this? We can't. The 991 Turbo Cabriolet is quicker to 60, quicker to 100, and 6 miles per hour faster through the standing kilometer. Sometimes the Porsche 991 Turbo performs like a beast, sometimes it doesn't. This time it certainly did.


    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Louisville ky
    Posts
    716
    Rep Points
    551.3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Are both engines hand built? Could it be possible they got a "dud" gtr and that one in a million 991? I really doubt it, but I cant think of a logical explanation as to why the gtr would get beat like that.

    edit* after watching it again it seems like the gtr couldn't quite put the power down maybe traction was the main issue?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,488
    Rep Points
    32,174.7
    Mentioned
    2112 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by G0TB00ST? Click here to enlarge
    Are both engines hand built? Could it be possible they got a "dud" gtr and that one in a million 991? I really doubt it, but I cant think of a logical explanation as to why the gtr would get beat like that.

    edit* after watching it again it seems like the gtr couldn't quite put the power down maybe traction was the main issue?
    Even if traction was an issue off the line how do you explain the trap speed or it getting pulled up top like that?

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Louisville ky
    Posts
    716
    Rep Points
    551.3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    No clue lol. Going back to my original theory maybe gtr was a dud

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    973
    Rep Points
    442.4
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    5


    Yes Reputation No
    GTR could be a "dud", but as far as I know every engine gets dyno-tested before it gets put in the car so I don't know how they'd let one slip through. Saw this video a few days ago, was also very surprised by how far ahead the 911 finished.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    119,488
    Rep Points
    32,174.7
    Mentioned
    2112 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    322



    Yes Reputation No
    The 911 should trap a little higher in coupe form but with a cab I'm surprised. The convertible is a soft top so it doesn't add a whole ton of weight but this wasn't even the Turbo S.

    Stage 2 or 2.5 E9X M3 S65 V8 supercharger kit for sale
    : http://www.boostaddict.com/showthrea...r-kit-for-sale

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Louisville ky
    Posts
    716
    Rep Points
    551.3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Maybe there was some tester bias...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    London and USA
    Posts
    2,061
    Rep Points
    1,444.9
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by G0TB00ST? Click here to enlarge
    Maybe there was some tester bias...

    These car blogs and magazines all LOVE Porsche
    2005 Porsche 996 TTS RWD - Eurodyne 60-130 in 6.50s
    2015 Audi A3 2.0 TFSI - Eurodyne 0 - 100 in 10.67s
    2015 McLaren 650S (RHD) - UK - 1/3rd owner yet to drive


    Click here to enlarge



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    288
    Rep Points
    679.5
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    This is why 1/4 mile traps don't tell the whole story. The gtrs were always slugs from a roll compared to their performance out of the hole so in a standing kilometer i would expect the 911 to nudge it out.They are geared very favorably for low end so what surprised me was the 911 pulling on it so soon into the run though

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •