Close

Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Gunman in attacks in Norway.

    Police Knew Gunman’s Name Before Arrest

    • Click here to enlarge Click here to enlarge Click here to enlarge Click here to enlarge Click here to enlarge Click here to enlarge Click here to enlarge


    British news anchor questions how authorities were aware of Breivik’s identity in advance
    Paul Joseph Watson
    Prison Planet.com
    Monday, July 25, 2011
    Click here to enlarge

    Despite being portrayed by the media as inept due to the length of time it took them to reach the island of Utoeya, it has now emerged that police knew the name of gunman Anders Behring Breivik before they even arrested him, a startling admission that prompted one of Britain’s top news anchors to question how authorities were aware of the gunman’s identity in advance.
    During his Channel 4 News broadcast on Friday evening, host Jon Snow asked “why police knew the killer’s name by the time they had arrived on the island,” reported the Telegraph live blog.
    “He surrendered the moment police called his name 3 minutes after they arrived. What we don’t know is how the police knew the terrorist’s name before they arrested him,” said Snow, who is recognized as one of Britain’s most trusted news anchors, and cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”.
    Snow also posed the question on his official Twitter page.
    How authorities knew the gunman’s identity before his slaughter of young Norwegians on the island of Utoeya had even come to an end, and while the overwhelming speculation still centered around Islamic terrorists, is a mystery, as is the question of why the cops didn’t shoot Breivik immediately.


    • Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge
      Click here to enlarge

    It’s also starkly inconsistent with the “incompetence” angle that’s been heavily pushed by the establishment media in explaining why it took over 90 minutes for police to reach the island, a gap that significantly contributed to Breivik being able to claim such a huge number of victims.
    Some have speculated that Breivik may have had accomplices, and although police disregarded eyewitness accounts of multiple shooters on the island, during testimony at his court case today, Breivik admitted that he was merely one part of an organization that included at least two other “cells” who were planning future attacks.
    “I believe that there were two people who were shooting,” survivor Alexander Stavdal told Norwegian VG, while other eyewitnesses reported hearing gunshots from “two different places on the island at the same time.”
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    647
    Rep Points
    1,555.9
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    16


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Reputation: Yes | No
    Funny how they tried to blame the Muslims for this, it was a white Christian people $#@!ing deal with it.
    Click here to enlarge

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,608
    Rep Points
    3,236.6
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    Reputation: Yes | No
    guy cant get death penalty, oh thats right; killing people is wrong I forgot.

    Socialist pussy countries cant give death penalties, damn shame.
    Some people live long, meaningful lives.

    Other people eat shit and die.

    I'm not racist, I hate everybody equally; especially fat people.


    Click here to enlarge

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Scorpion Click here to enlarge
    Funny how they tried to blame the Muslims for this, it was a white Christian people $#@!ing deal with it.
    Umm he is a freemason
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,172
    Rep Points
    31,309.1
    Mentioned
    2056 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    314


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GG///M3 Click here to enlarge
    There isn't a conspiracy in everything. Trying to connect this to some giant conspiracy is $#@!ing retarded.

    An imbalanced guy decided to kill people to raise awareness of Muslim immigration in Norway. Masons have nothing to do with any of it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,192
    Rep Points
    6,728.5
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    68


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GG///M3 Click here to enlarge
    and while the overwhelming speculation still centered around Islamic terrorists, is a mystery, as is the question of why the cops didn’t shoot Breivik immediately
    Don't know who was speculating Islamitic involvement. Here (Holland) it was immediately clear that the attacker was not Islamittic at al, and there were no speculations.
    The cops didn't shoot Breivik for the simple reason that cops in Norway do by default NOT carry firearms.
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,172
    Rep Points
    31,309.1
    Mentioned
    2056 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    314


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DavidV Click here to enlarge
    Norway do by default NOT carry firearms.
    What do they do, blow a whistle and kindly ask for someone to stop? Then make them write sentences on a chalk board showing what they did wrong?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,192
    Rep Points
    6,728.5
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    68


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    What do they do, blow a whistle and kindly ask for someone to stop? Then make them write sentences on a chalk board showing what they did wrong?
    They will stop you without shooting. And you will be fined into the next century for for instance speeding.
    The Scandinavian countries are a speeders nightmare. You will not have the Gumball3000 ever visit Finland. Fines there are proportinal to your yearly income, so they can get out of hand really quick.
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    117,172
    Rep Points
    31,309.1
    Mentioned
    2056 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    314


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DavidV Click here to enlarge
    They will stop you without shooting. And you will be fined into the next century for for instance speeding.
    The Scandinavian countries are a speeders nightmare. You will not have the Gumball3000 ever visit Finland. Fines there are proportinal to your yearly income, so they can get out of hand really quick.
    I really don't think a fine for speeding would have done much in this situation. Same for no guns.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,192
    Rep Points
    6,728.5
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    68


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    I really don't think a fine for speeding would have done much in this situation. Same for no guns.
    No, not in this instance. They had to call for special police forces (SWAT team) in this case.
    Click here to enlarge
    They are armed. Getting them to the spot took time, and even then they were not keen on killing him, just arresting. This is Norway, not the USA. I'm sure if this would have happenend in the USA he would be dead now.
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    le Paris
    Posts
    6,653
    Rep Points
    -256.0
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    wtf?!?! they have all the tools to stop a speeding car but they can't shoot an insane man trying to shoot everyone near him?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,192
    Rep Points
    6,728.5
    Mentioned
    73 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    68


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Nope. Norway is in essence not a violent country (exept against whales, different discussion) . Security there is very loose. They like it like that, and do not want to change that. Not even after what happened last friday.
    Also the police are very underfunded.
    The only police helicopter was grounded during lack of spare parts. The spare helicopter was sold last year due to budget cuts.
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    5,159
    Rep Points
    526.1
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6



    Reputation: Yes | No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    What do they do, blow a whistle and kindly ask for someone to stop? Then make them write sentences on a chalk board showing what they did wrong?
    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sorena Click here to enlarge
    wtf?!?! they have all the tools to stop a speeding car but they can't shoot an insane man trying to shoot everyone near him?
    I agree Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DavidV Click here to enlarge
    Don't know who was speculating Islamitic involvement. Here (Holland) it was immediately clear that the attacker was not Islamittic at al, and there were no speculations.
    The cops didn't shoot Breivik for the simple reason that cops in Norway do by default NOT carry firearms.
    Was much discussed about his Freemason back ground, because here in the US they to be labeling him as a Christian right winger of sorts.
    Click here to enlargeClick here to enlarge

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •