Close

Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: More Mercedes SLC details emerge - 6 cylinder turbo engine options?

              
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    104,340
    Rep Points
    25,442.6
    Mentioned
    1641 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    255


    Reputation: Yes | No

    More Mercedes SLC details emerge - 6 cylinder turbo engine options?

    AutoBild reports that the entry level SLC will come standard with a 350 horsepower V6 that is turbocharged. That horsepower numbers seems a little low to us and the report also says the power might go as high as 550 horsepower. Well, in that case, wouldn't they use the turbo V8 they already have? The car will not have Gulllwing doors and that is the part of the report we find most believable.

    Click here to enlarge

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    638
    Rep Points
    567.0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I like those headlights a little better than the current SLS's headlights. You are absolutely right about the V8.... I just don't see Mercedes creating a separate engine just for this car; it'd be more practical (and more realistic) to use one they already have.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    104,340
    Rep Points
    25,442.6
    Mentioned
    1641 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    255


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Exeenom Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I like those headlights a little better than the current SLS's headlights. You are absolutely right about the V8.... I just don't see Mercedes creating a separate engine just for this car; it'd be more practical (and more realistic) to use one they already have.
    I think what will happen is they may turbo the 350 motor for the entry level but the high end versions are almost certain to use the V8's available.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    104,340
    Rep Points
    25,442.6
    Mentioned
    1641 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    255


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Here is a rendering of the rear:

    Click here to enlarge

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    158
    Rep Points
    176.4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Not sure about the rear and the perspective is fugged up as you move across the bottom. Still a mean looking front end and rear quarter. Not a fan of the filler cover.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,608
    Rep Points
    3,230.5
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    Reputation: Yes | No
    Why do people always expect a car company to use an engine they already have in a model lineup that is not supposed to step on the toes of the car that the engine in question actually comes from?

    Why the hell would MB put their flagship motor in the SLC if the SLS already has it? Wouldnt it outperform the SLS and cost half as much? BMW wouldnt do this either, which is why you wont see an S65 in any chassis; they wont do it because youll be raping your own model lineups.
    Some people live long, meaningful lives.

    Other people eat shit and die.

    I'm not racist, I hate everybody equally; especially fat people.



  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    104,340
    Rep Points
    25,442.6
    Mentioned
    1641 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    255


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DBFIU Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why do people always expect a car company to use an engine they already have in a model lineup that is not supposed to step on the toes of the car that the engine in question actually comes from?

    Why the hell would MB put their flagship motor in the SLC if the SLS already has it? Wouldnt it outperform the SLS and cost half as much? BMW wouldnt do this either, which is why you wont see an S65 in any chassis; they wont do it because youll be raping your own model lineups.
    Not sure what you mean, MB won't put their flagship motor in this. They are developing a new turbo 6 but the M157 twin turbo V8 will likely find its way in. It won't be the SLS motor.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,608
    Rep Points
    3,230.5
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    Reputation: Yes | No
    If they put an overly powerful engine in this lineup it will step on the toes of their already powerful cars. I think a 450 hp engine in this car will be self destructive because MB wont sell as many SLSs because this thing will outperform it.
    Some people live long, meaningful lives.

    Other people eat shit and die.

    I'm not racist, I hate everybody equally; especially fat people.



  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    104,340
    Rep Points
    25,442.6
    Mentioned
    1641 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    255


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DBFIU Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If they put an overly powerful engine in this lineup it will step on the toes of their already powerful cars. I think a 450 hp engine in this car will be self destructive because MB wont sell as many SLSs because this thing will outperform it.
    Mercedes does a bit of cannibalism. Does the C63 hurt the E63?

    I think it's only natural to expect a V8 in this car. It won't be an M156 so it has to be a turbo V8. They can hold it back with tuning if really necessary like they did with the C63.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,608
    Rep Points
    3,230.5
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I mean, thats why porsche doesnt put the 3.8 in the cayman because then it would be a GT3. And BMW doesnt put the S65 in the 335 because then it would be an M3. So at the end of the day, its the same $#@! with a lower pricetag which hurts the OEM.
    Some people live long, meaningful lives.

    Other people eat shit and die.

    I'm not racist, I hate everybody equally; especially fat people.



  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    le Paris
    Posts
    6,662
    Rep Points
    -169.0
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I agree with DBFIU.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    104,340
    Rep Points
    25,442.6
    Mentioned
    1641 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    255


    Reputation: Yes | No

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by DBFIU Click here to enlarge
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I mean, thats why porsche doesnt put the 3.8 in the cayman because then it would be a GT3. And BMW doesnt put the S65 in the 335 because then it would be an M3. So at the end of the day, its the same $#@! with a lower pricetag which hurts the OEM.
    Let's see what they do with it though. Mecedes isn't scared of outperforming more expensive models.

    The Cayman with a 3.8 would eat the 911 alive. The Cayman is neutered because of it. The 335 got the turbo motor but the next gen all the cars will have the same basic motor in different states of tune.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,608
    Rep Points
    3,230.5
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    Reputation: Yes | No
    I think this SLC car looks good. If I didnt have kids I would buy one.

    I guess I will have to settle for a CTSV when my lease is up.
    Some people live long, meaningful lives.

    Other people eat shit and die.

    I'm not racist, I hate everybody equally; especially fat people.



Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •