Close

Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No

    Thumbs up MHP S1 E55 Dyno Video and Results

    MHP S1 E55 AMG, 2006:



    497rwhp/600rwtq SAE, 93 Octane, 1:1/4th Gear, DJ

    Mods:

    MHP v3 CDT, MHP 178mm Pulley, MHP Thermostat, MHP Heat Exchanger, MHP IC Pump


    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Next up TB, cams and full catless exhaust.

    Thanks

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    118,904
    Rep Points
    31,882.8
    Mentioned
    2093 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    319


    Yes Reputation No
    498 whp before throttle bodies, cams, and full exhaust is impressive.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    498 whp before throttle bodies, cams, and full exhaust is impressive.
    Thanks, I like the 600rwtq better Click here to enlarge 730lb/ft at 18% DT loss with 2 power mods (tuning/smallish pulley) isn't a bad start. Still the 498rwhp puts this E 13th on the overall dragtimes E55 dyno list (entry was just edited and should be up by tom.), as noted more hardware on the way. Car needs a LSD badly before fall at MIR.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    638
    Rep Points
    567.0
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    6


    Yes Reputation No
    Holly Power-House Batman!!!!!! Click here to enlarge That's some serious power from just a pulley, tune, and some cooling mods..... I can't wait to see your final output Click here to enlarge
    2007 E63 P30
    Click here to enlarge

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Thanks Mo.

    Also worth noting 7k indicated is 7k actual in a 55k unlike a M156.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    4,616
    Rep Points
    3,236.6
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    33


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    thats a $#@!ing ton of torque
    Some people live long, meaningful lives.

    Other people eat shit and die.

    I'm not racist, I hate everybody equally; especially fat people.


    Click here to enlarge

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    10
    Rep Points
    48.0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Andy : Really Nice work !! That is a very good Number for both Torque & Horsepower , especially with those choke you to death stock exhaust Manifolds. That is what is killing your Horse power after 5750 RPM . Besides the fact the fuel curve went pig rich. I believe the smaller pulley is not an Issue , for street & Strip driving. Your heat soak recovery is much better. We ran a 190 mm driven pulley, years ago , Rear truck Ice box, 4 Row Heat exchanger, & 2 Pumps. We blasted through 2-10 lbs bags of Ice ,every 1/4 mile run. Then had a 45 minute cooling down period , before the next run. We never could set a new record , Torque management Issues !! really Bad, It would pull the Throttle back to 79%. ( You've got that Fixed ) Wish we had that answer back then! As progression goes on I would do the exhaust system first. Then Cams. Tuning and incremental, increases up to this point would be easier to see. And any vaccum ? air leaks would not be an issue , becaues the intake has not been distrubed . imho
    Cheers _PTEngineering

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by _PTE_ Click here to enlarge
    Andy : Really Nice work !! That is a very good Number for both Torque & Horsepower , especially with those choke you to death stock exhaust Manifolds. That is what is killing your Horse power after 5750 RPM . Besides the fact the fuel curve went pig rich. I believe the smaller pulley is not an Issue , for street & Strip driving. Your heat soak recovery is much better. We ran a 190 mm driven pulley, years ago , Rear truck Ice box, 4 Row Heat exchanger, & 2 Pumps. We blasted through 2-10 lbs bags of Ice ,every 1/4 mile run. Then had a 45 minute cooling down period , before the next run. We never could set a new record , Torque management Issues !! really Bad, It would pull the Throttle back to 79%. ( You've got that Fixed ) Wish we had that answer back then! As progression goes on I would do the exhaust system first. Then Cams. Tuning and incremental, increases up to this point would be easier to see. And any vaccum ? air leaks would not be an issue , becaues the intake has not been distrubed . imho
    Cheers _PTEngineering

    Pat thanks my friend!

    Coming from someone that knows these mills inside and out the comments are greatly appreciated. I'm with you on the smaller pulley theory, more boost = more heat and obviously less performance and consistency especially on the street. I'm more than satisfied with the 178 and may only play around with a larger pulley after the rest of the mods are done and dialed in.

    I also agree with you in that in order to really uncork these motors you have to tune the TCU as well, so much TQ management going on in there, it's a must.

    Next up: TB and Exhaust just like you called it. Click here to enlarge

    Take care bud!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    879
    Rep Points
    891.7
    Mentioned
    63 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    This mimics my results. 498WHP/600WTQ - ASP pulley, IC pump, filters only. Custom dyno tune. Our dynapack is 1.0cf and reads +/- 3hp local dynojets.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by BrenM3 Click here to enlarge
    This mimics my results. 498WHP/600WTQ - ASP pulley, IC pump, filters only. Custom dyno tune. Our dynapack is 1.0cf and reads +/- 3hp local dynojets.
    Really? I've never seen HP or TQ as high with those 2 power mods. Especially Torque. You have to tune the TCU in able to do so, too many TQ limiters in there not too. Please post a graph/video if possible.

    Thanks

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    OH
    Posts
    1,454
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0



    Yes Reputation No
    Just checked the list again:

    http://www.dragtimes.com/Mercedes-Be...lip-22795.html

    I don't see your entry Bren, nor anyone with comparable numbers with the same mods or even close to them.

    Thanks

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •