Close

    • Very strong Eurocharged E92 M3 S65 V8 custom dyno tune results - Stock, tuned, and tuned+pulley graph

      Very strong tuning results here from Eurocharged Performance. On this network Eurocharged Mercedes tuning results are shown most often as they are well known in the Mercedes / AMG tuning scene but the company accommodates almost every make and motor out there. The E92 M3 S65 V8 included and their custom dyno tune here shows excellent gains on a conservative reading Dyno Dynamics. Let's start with the baseline of 317 wheel horsepower and 243.6 pound-feet of torque at the wheels.


      With just the Eurocharged custom dyno tune only output rises to 358 wheel horsepower and 269 pound-feet of torque at the wheels. With the addition of an underdrive pulley this grows to 369.4 wheel horsepower and 273 pound-feet of torque.

      The tune only gains are an incredibly impressive 39 wheel horsepower and 25.4 pound-feet of torque at the wheels. That is flat out gigantic on the S65 V8 tune only. The total increase with the underdrive pulley plus tune over the baseline is 52.4 wheel horsepower and 29.4 pound-feet of torque. The 369.4 wheel horsepower figure would be close to the ~400 wheel horsepower range on a Dynojet.

      Keep in mind this is likely 93 octane fuel. What this goes to show though is the difference between a custom Dyno tune and an off the shelf file. There is also different pricing for both but these are some of the strongest tune only S65 V8 gains seen.

      This article was originally published in forum thread: Very strong Eurocharged E92 M3 S65 V8 custom dyno tune results - Stock, tuned, and tuned+pulley graph started by Sticky View original post
      Comments 33 Comments
      1. GearHead03's Avatar
        GearHead03 -
        Here's to 11.50@120+ slips coming up soon then!
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GearHead03 Click here to enlarge
        Here's to 11.50@120+ slips coming up soon then!
        I don't think you are going to be seeing many NA M3's on the strip chasing records these days.
      1. Irishace's Avatar
        Irishace -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GearHead03 Click here to enlarge
        Here's to 11.50@120+ slips coming up soon then!
        You are clueless, there has been one recorded NA M3 breaking 12s and the highest trap was 118mph and this was at Sac pre timer fix. Please just stop.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Irishace Click here to enlarge
        You are clueless, there has been one recorded NA M3 breaking 12s and the highest trap was 118mph and this was at Sac pre timer fix. Please just stop.
        It wasn't pre timer fix btw.
      1. Irishace's Avatar
        Irishace -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
        It wasn't pre timer fix btw.
        I believe it was Sticky.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Irishace Click here to enlarge
        I believe it was Sticky.
        I was there, it wasn't.
      1. GearHead03's Avatar
        GearHead03 -
        Not sure I understand the hatred. Current and best times are from cars with 370hp. This car has that with cats. We know cat less is worth 30hp. That's a 400hp car.
        Brings me back to my point. If Irish has a tune that's good for 15hp, and loads up the tune that gained 40ish, we should see a definitive gain in mph if he switches tunes while at the track
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GearHead03 Click here to enlarge
        Not sure I understand the hatred. Current and best times are from cars with 370hp. This car has that with cats. We know cat less is worth 30hp. That's a 400hp car.
        This is ricer math man.

        There isn't any hatred just you just are quoting unrealistic times on paper.
      1. GearHead03's Avatar
        GearHead03 -
        30hp from cat delete is unrealistic ricer math, but 40hp from a tune is not? Well, let me revert back to m3post mode and only post +1 and good job bro, since free speech and logic are ridiculed here
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by GearHead03 Click here to enlarge
        30hp from cat delete is unrealistic ricer math, but 40hp from a tune is not? Well, let me revert back to m3post mode and only post +1 and good job bro, since free speech and logic are ridiculed here
        Logic and solid reasoning are praised here. When you display it you'll see that for yourself.
      1. Imran@Evolve's Avatar
        Imran@Evolve -
        He has a point. All gains on dyno should be validated by track times/pbox times. Nothing wrong in saying that at all.
      1. Sticky's Avatar
        Sticky -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Imran@Evolve Click here to enlarge
        He has a point. All gains on dyno should be validated by track times/pbox times. Nothing wrong in saying that at all.
        It's the way he's adding the numbers up and comparing different dynos and different mods in different conditions having to equal X on the dragstrip. Just doesn't work that way.
      1. Irishace's Avatar
        Irishace -
        Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Imran@Evolve Click here to enlarge
        He has a point. All gains on dyno should be validated by track times/pbox times. Nothing wrong in saying that at all.
        He may be right but this is not Utopia. Its very difficult in practice to go to the dyno load tunes, shuffles tunes, re-dyno etc. then go to a drag strip, load tunes, shuffle tunes, record data etc. It would be ideal but its time consuming and I have 2 small kids and a wife and a demanding job. Not much time to play.