Close

Activity Stream

Filter
Sort By Time Show
Recent Recent Popular Popular Anytime Anytime Last 24 Hours Last 24 Hours Last 7 Days Last 7 Days Last 30 Days Last 30 Days All All Photos Photos Forum Forums Articles Articles
Filter by: Popular Articles Last 7 Days Clear All
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-30-2016, 05:51 PM
    Many of you are wondering why someone would ditch the S62 5.0 liter V8 under the hood of the E39 M5 for a smaller BMW inline-6 motor. Well, these results make a strong argument for such a swap. This E39 M5 belongs to BimmerBoost member @Omni. You can read all about his decision to do the swap in a past article. Even at lower power levels than the car runs currently it was a beast. @Omni beat up on a tuned Cadillac CTS-V Wagon as well as a tuned F13 M6 Gran Coupe. With the car now making over 800 to the wheels it is safe to say he can take on even more stout competition. He is running a Precision 6266 turbocharger at 35 psi of boost. 100% methanol is injected in a direct port setup. A water and methanol blend is utilized as well before the compressor. Tuning is by @NickG of Technique Tuning and done on the stock DME no less. The result? 813 horsepower and 819 lb-ft of torque at the wheels which works out to comfortably over 900 at the crank. However you feel 800+ horsepower at the wheels is serious power and this may be the world's most powerful E39 at this point. Simply incredible results and props to @Omni for continuing to push the boundaries.
    27 replies | 1935 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-03-2016, 03:43 PM
    This is getting ridiculous. We were already blown away by the Gen V Viper making quadruple digit horsepower on the stock motor this early on in its tuning. A tuner by the name of Unleashed Tuning managed to hit 1002 horsepower to the wheels on 93 octane. Calvo Motorsports has taken things quite a bit further on 93 octane pump gas with 1187 rear wheel horsepower and 1175 lb-ft of torque at the wheels. What allows this kind of pump gas power? It is tuned on a Motec M1 standalone ECU. Calvo's tuner believes they could easily get it over 1200 whp on pump as well but they think they are pushing the motor far enough as is. No knock, no detonation, and no issues with almost 1200 whp on 93 octane pump fuel. The scary thing is it can go further but nobody wants to be the first one to find the limit of the Gen V Viper internals. What can you say? The new Viper is badass.
    28 replies | 157 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    01-30-2016, 06:41 PM
    Congrats to AudiBoost member @spool twice who improved his 11.881 @ 115.93 1/4 mile run in his B8.5 Audi S5 to 11.652 @ 117.81. This is the quickest B8.5 Audi S5 time to date. What makes it impressive is this is still on the stock blower with no weight reduction as well as with Dunlop street tires. Mod list: - GIAC stage II v2 Race - GIAC TCU 4,000 rpm launch control - AFE filter - 034 Throttle Body Boot - Drilled hole in airbox - x-pipe mod - E85/93 octane mix - AWE-Tuning pulley Track density altitude at the time of the run was 567 feet. That means there is probably a more in it. Maybe a mid 11 at roughly 119 miles per hour? Definitely quick but there is not much more left to get out of the OEM blower. It will be interesting to see if he takes it further.
    28 replies | 356 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-02-2016, 05:45 PM
    We know the turbocharged 488 GTB should be much faster than the naturally aspirated 458 Italia it replaces. Especially in the 1/4 mile considering the Ferrari now has turbo torque to get it off the line quickly. EKanooRacing took what they say is a stock 488 GTB to the Bahrain dragstrip and here is the result. On a 1.706 60 foot time they managed a 10.372 @ 137.35 miles per hour. That is a very impressive run but this sort of performance should put the 488 GTB roughly even with the 650S from McLaren. So why did we see a 488 GTB lose from a roll to a McLaren MP4-12C which is less powerful than the 650S? Was that 488 GTB a dud? Was the MP4-12C tuned? Is EKanooRacing using race gas? Is the Bahrain dragstrip accurate? All valid questions. We will need to some runs on NHRA certified US strips to put this result in context.
    16 replies | 243 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-02-2016, 04:12 PM
    A couple nice runs here from a BMS JB4 tuned F10 BMW M5. The car is running a 50/50 blend of meth injection on 93 octane. It also features MSR intakes and R888 tires for traction. The Mustang GT Coyote V8 is blown with a Kenne Bell twin screw at 12 psi on E85. The M5 and Mustang go at it twice. The first run has the Coyote pulling decisively. In the second run the M5 takes the hit and holds off the Mustang GT. They each get a win which is great but it should have been settled with a decisive third race. Maybe we'll see a rematch? The Mustang gets a bonus run with a Paxton supercharged Gen II Dodge Viper at 6 psi of boost. The V10 is also stated to be stroked. The Coyote pulls it impressively so the Viper might want to run more boost next time. A run between the Viper and M5 would be fun to see as well.
    14 replies | 760 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-04-2016, 04:11 PM
    Things have changed a bit regarding rally racing spectators. Why? Well, take a look at the gif posted below and you will understand why. Back in the legendary 80's Group B days as well as other rally classes drivers would have to contend not only with the elements but spectators as well. This speaks for itself.
    12 replies | 570 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-03-2016, 04:01 PM
    This should not be a shocker as Hennessey often takes credit for the work of others. Don't believe it? Hennessey patted himself on the back for his HPE700 Mustang GT supercharger system when it is really Whipple's blower and design. Just like how the Hennessey HPE600 AMG GT S tune is really Eurocharged's tune. Jerry Thorton at Eurocharged did the custom dyno tune. Hennessey will essentially resell the $2499 Eurocharged M178 tune at a premium. Why bother with paying for the Hennessey name when you can go straight to the source? Anyone?
    14 replies | 283 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-04-2016, 07:43 PM
    Congratulations to BenzBoost member @charliekay who is so close to the 9's in his supercharged W204 C63 AMG that he can taste it. He upgraded to the Weistec 3.0 liter Stage III twin screw blower and ran 10.22 @ 137.09 which was a considerable improvement from the 10.83 @ 129.22 he managed on the Stage II 2.3 liter blower. Now with different wheels and tires he shaved it down to 10.173 @ 139.18 on a 1.549 60 foot. Obviously a better launch than the previous 1.606 60 foot so the new tire setup is helping. He is just a hair away from the 9's but as @charliekay is an Australian member keep in mind the weather is not doing him any favors right now. In the winter we might see that elusive 9 second pass which is certainly impressive for a stock internal supercharged M156.
    10 replies | 254 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-03-2016, 06:31 PM
    This is some hardware you do not see very often on the drag strip. These cars are more at home on the roadcourse but they certainly put up a good showing in a straightline as well. The hybrid Porsche 918 Spyder is well known with its naturally aspirated 608 horsepower 4.6 liter V8 that revs to 9150 rpm augmented by two electric motors for a total system output of 887 horsepower. Unlike the other two modern hybrid supercars the 918 Spyder sends power to all four wheels. That means the electric torque helps it get off the line quickly and it puts the power down effectively. How quickly does it move? Well, it makes a McLaren 650S look like it is standing still. The 650S is no slouch by the way capable of running low 10's at high 130's in the 1/4 mile thanks to its low curb weight and efficient rear wheel drive layout powered by a 3.8 liter twin turbo V8. The 918 Spyder gets the better launch with a 1.64 60 foot to the 650S Spyder's 1.88. The end result is the 918 running 9.835 @ 144.95 to the Mclaren's 10.912 @ 133.46. The video claims the best time for the McLaren was a 10.3 @ 137.5 from earlier in the day but no proof is posted. It certainly is believable and well within reason. It also means the Ferrari 488 GTB should be a good match for it. Great runs and a well done video with multiple camera angles.
    7 replies | 350 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-03-2016, 12:32 AM
    Hennessey is releasing a 'HPE600' flash tune for the C190 Mercedes-AMG AMG GT S. And why not? It's a cash grab for Hennessy who will gladly charge you a premium for a tune. The results are solid but then again who exactly is struggling to get power out of the AMG GT S M178 4.0 liter twin turbo motor? Hennessey gains 48 wheel horsepower and 100 lb-ft of torque at the wheels. Numbers in the range of what you should expect from the M178 engine. Weistec manages to come up with 20+ lb-ft more torque on 91 octane pump gas and not 93 octane pump gas. The 497 wheel horsepower and 466 lb-ft of wheel torque baseline is quite strong. The AMG GT S clearly responds in stock form to octane. We have seen considerable variance in stock dyno results just from pump gas octane. Ras gas pushes it over 500 whp stock. Should you go for the Hennessey tune? No. You'll pay a premium for the name (there are much better tuning values out there) and Hennessey does not offer the upgrade potential or experience no the platform of someone like Renntech for example. Look at the numbers but do not get suckered into the Hennessey name.
    7 replies | 295 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-02-2016, 09:50 PM
    Ouch. As you know MotorTrend did a track comparison between the Dodge Viper ACR, Chevrolet Corvette Z06, and a brand new 911 GT3 RS. The GT3 RS tested was purple. The wrecked GT3 RS captured by spectators at the track is also purple. That is not a coincidence. Spectators say the car was deemed a total loss and apparently Porsche sent it back to Germany for repairs. They have track day insurance for journalist testing so nobody needs to shed any tears for Porsche. Rumor has it Randy Pobst spun this car several times. We do not have proof of that. We do have proof of what looks to be the same GT3 RS he tested in pretty bad shape below.
    3 replies | 346 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:00 PM
    N54 owners have had a 'downpipe fix' available for some time. N55 owners have not. What is the issue? Basically, if you run a catless downpipe you will get codes from the ECU. This creates a problem when trying to pass emissions, run at a track day, clear codes, etc. In comes Area74 to the rescue with their i02 simulator. It's a fairly straightforward box designed to do one thing. Area74 describes the details and process best below. Here is the nuts and bolts, and a little more of our story/history. For obvious reasons I cant go into any great detail about the software. Many vehicle enthusiast enjoy modifying their vehicles, for appearance and/or power. One major modification happens to be exhaust, wether in be a header/DP with a "sport" cat or completley catless. Either way, increasing flow, increases power. We are in total support, as it's your ride, you paid for it... When cat's are removed, the PCM/ECM is very quick to determine (via testing) that they are missing. this results in a check engine light P0420 and/or P0430. There are lots of tunes available to eliminate this annoyance, either direct programming or an add on unit that will simply autoclear all and any fault codes. This is fine, however....."autoclear" means it clears ANY codes, so even if you have an issue, you will never really know.... Autoclear = erase codes instantly....how many codes do you have for your engine ? how will you know something went wrong when you should know? Direct tune = P0420, P0430 are often written out of the program, so you never get a readiness "PASS" it simply shows "not ready" or "x" So, how does the io2V3.0 CatSim help...... A programmed microprocessor reads the actual o2 sensor, then through software manipulates it into a voltage signal that resembles a known good cat. Autoclear can be disabled, you won't get a P0420/P0430, it passes the monitors and life is good. If the computer detects a fault, the check engine light will still notify you of a problem. If you run catless (for off road of course) wouldn't you want the check engine light active if a problem occurs? Autoclear is a double bladed sword. JB4 and Cobb use an autoclear. After receiving permission from another site, we spent 8 months developing and providing updates to members as we went along, we worked hard and became very attached to BMW owners, we wanted to provide a solution. KevBquick became our major tester about 6 months ago (we asked permission and for a long standing member to test and provide honest results) sample after sample were sent to KevBquick, data was collected and on Jan 18......of this year, we had great news, it was fixed!!!!!!! In 7 miles, KevBquick passed all readiness monitors for the o2's and cat, running catless and JB4 autoclear off......he called the io2 a "beast!" In all that time we tested on numerous models, Toyota, Honda, chevrolet, Dodge, Jeep, ford, and nailed everyone!!!!! Product page: http://www.area74.ca/io2
    3 replies | 172 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-04-2016, 06:39 PM
    Another day another 1000+ wheel horsepower Gen V Viper. We all know at this point that the Viper easily makes quadruple digit power to the wheels on the stock motor. It even does it on pump gas. So what happens when you build the motor with stronger aftermarket parts? 1400+ wheel horsepower is what happens. This is just the tip of the iceberg as we see built motor Gen V's pushed but 1401 wheel horsepower is not bad at all. The full specs are not revealed but the car is tuned on a Motec standalone and has two snails forcing more air in. It's possible that stock motor examples will approach these numbers but peace of mind, reliability, and longevity were factors for the owner here. Also, he can crank it up further if he desires. 93 octane: Race gas: The car also holds the Gen V Viper 1/2 mile record for now. To say it is a beast is an understatement.
    3 replies | 139 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:35 PM
    Some good runs here but unfortunately all of the cars do not run each other. The camera car is a Paxton Blown Mustang 5.0 GT Coyote with roughly 700 horsepower. It captures the action as the cars go at it on the highway. The first run is the 700 horsepower STI vs. what is said to be an 800 horsepower Mazdaspeed 3. We would love to know the mods on the Mazda as it is fast! Very, very fast. It makes easy work of the STI from a 60 mph roll the STI itself being no slouch. They go at it again and the second time the STI gets a better start and holds off the Mazda. The STI then goes up against the Mustang camera car. The camera work is poor on this run but the Mustang gets the hit and holds off the STI. Next up is the Mustang and the C63 AMG and they do several runs. The first run has the Mustang jump and it takes an easy lead which it holds. The C63 gets a much better start in the second run and opens a quick lead thanks to the twin screw torque and holds it up top thanks to the M156 top end. The final run between the Mustang and the C63 again has a quick count with the Mustang getting on the throttle first. It is a good race between the two but the GT edges slightly up top. We wish we had more detailed specs on the cars but good runs nevertheless. Edit Mazdaspeed 3 specs: built 2.3 built head PTE6466 e85 lots of boost
    2 replies | 159 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-04-2016, 08:11 PM
    The design of the Ferrari 488 GTB was never the issue. It essentially improves on the looks of the 458 which is already stunning. In this new turbo era the 458 Italia lacked a bit of muscle which the 488 GTB addresses with its twin turbo 3.9 liter direct injected 671 horsepower V8 engine. It is practically perfect the way it sits but a nice set of rims can improve things and set it apart. Especially if the design is classy. Unfortunately, some people go too far in changing the look and put on some extremely heavy chrome monstrosity. That is not what you do to a Ferrari. This is how it is done.
    1 replies | 133 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-02-2016, 03:51 PM
    There is another centrifugal supercharger option on the horizon for the Gen V Dodge Viper. D3 Performance Engineering has an option based on the Procharger F1X and a Paxton Novi 2000 based kit will be released in the next few weeks. Calvo Motorsports is already testing it out. The full specs and pricing are not yet available but we do know is at 6.5 pounds of boost they cracked 800 rear wheel horsepower on a Dynojet. That is impressive considering a Gen III Viper manages roughly 650 rear wheel horsepower with a similar blower at the same boost. The 800 wheel horsepower figure is with them running out of fuel. With a fuel system upgraded beyond an upgraded pump and the ID850 injectors they are running who knows what they will hit but probably into the quadruple digits. More details to come as the release date nears.
    0 replies | 155 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    02-04-2016, 06:02 PM
    This 1/4 mile run by a 650S answers and raises some performance questions. This is the same 650S that went up against a Porsche 918 Spyder on the dragstrip the other day. It ran a slower time against the Porsche but below is a video of its best run which is a 10.309 @ 137.47. You might notice this matches up very well to the 10.372 @ 137.35 run we saw from a stock Ferrari 488 GTB in Bahrain. Obviously comparing times from different cars on different strips is not exactly a uniform science but the numbers tell us the cars should be fairly even against each other. Keep in mind this McLaren is the heavier Spider although the weight premium for the removable top is negligible at just under 100 pounds. The run also tell us the 488 GTB that was beat from a roll by an MP4-12C likely went up against a tuned car despite claims the MP4-12C was stock. We know the 650S is considerably more powerful than the MP4-12C with much more areas under the curve. A McLarenBoost member also ran a 10.67 @ 135 in his stock MP4-12C. Head to head matchups are going to be fun to see as it looks to be a driver's race between a 650S and 488. The 675LT model of course changes things considerably in McLaren's favor.
    0 replies | 118 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:33 PM
    We often state less is more when it comes to wheels on high end cars. 'Bling' just doesn't work on a Lamborghini or any Italian exotic. Leave the big chrome wheels to cheap tacky modding. When the wheels look like they come from the factory you know it's done right. This is done right. The Loma forged 21 inch RS1 wheels look right at home on this Huracan. Tasteful and finished beautifully to compliment the Huracan's paint.
    0 replies | 70 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:21 PM
    Yeah more runs would have helped for context but I thought that MS3 was very fast on the first run.
    2 replies | 159 view(s)
  • pr3ci5n335i's Avatar
    Yesterday, 09:13 PM
    Assuming these are crank HP numbers? Idk but that MS3 didn't look that fast to me. I would've liked to see the Benz and the MS3 go at for comparison sakes.
    2 replies | 159 view(s)
  • BigM62's Avatar
    Yesterday, 07:23 PM
    LOL. I signed a life time pact with with my car. And my life time.:naughty:
    10 replies | 254 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    10 replies | 254 view(s)
  • charliekay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 06:34 PM
    Time to move on to something else. I've had the car for almost 8 years and really don't feel like going down the route of built engine. We can only run a 9 here or 140mph before we need a cage, shute etc.. which I don't want to do. I can go to the expense of doing it, run a 9 then what. I also have 2 new cars I am waiting on allocation for, and don't have anymore room in the garage so one has to go.
    10 replies | 254 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    10 replies | 254 view(s)
  • charliekay's Avatar
    Yesterday, 05:42 PM
    ^this. Weistec has done a great job with kit as a whole, but we decide to put the car on the dyno and custom tune it to get the best possible results out of it. Car is running the standard pulley and is consistently doing 137-139mph. We were contemplating running the 60mm pulley but I am not 100% comfortable doing so on stock internals. I wanted to see how quick I could get it without it, not sure if the increased in boost will give me that 2/10ths I need to get it to a 9. I have the car up for sale, if it doesn't sell by the time the weather cools here I will go back in better racing weather and see how quick it goes, if it goes a 10.0 then I might try the 60mm pulley, but can't see 10 degrees drop in temp being worth 1/10th.
    10 replies | 254 view(s)
  • Sticky's Avatar
    Yesterday, 04:54 PM
    I'm not sure. Whatever the area around the North Texas University is called.
    12 replies | 570 view(s)
More Activity